Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

A Quicker VTE Test?

A new risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE) that was validated in a recent study in England may portend a quicker way to test patients in the U.S.

A research team from the University of Nottingham in England developed an algorithm to measure a patient’s risk for VTE using data points often already collected by hospitalists, including information about chronic renal disease, heart failure, and body mass index. In the study, the risk prediction equation explained 33% of the variation in women and 34% in men in the validation cohort evaluated at five years (BMJ. 2011;343:d4656). The report added that the D statistic was 1.43 for women and 1.45 for men, while the receiver operating curve statistic was 0.75 for both sexes.

The researchers then created a website where physicians can input a set of data points on patients and generate a risk profile.

“The algorithm should be validated in the U.S., though we have no reason to think it won’t work in the U.S.,” senior author Julia Hippisley-Cox, MD, FRCGP, MRCP, professor of clinical epidemiology and general practice at the University of Nottingham wrote in an email. “And assuming it performs well, then it could be used by hospital doctors to systematically risk assess patients for VTE risk on admission. Patients at high risk could be given prophylaxis.”

Dr. Hippisley-Cox says it’s too early to tell if the site will become a popular reference tool.

“The algorithm is published as open-source software, so anyone can use it for research,” she writes. It “would be … interesting to have a team of academics in the U.S. use it in a research project.”

  • A Quicker VTE Test?

    August 24, 2011

  • In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

    August 24, 2011

  • Investment Strategies for Early Career Hospitalists

    August 18, 2011

  • Neuro-HM Gains Numbers, Momentum

    August 18, 2011

  • False Assumptions

    August 18, 2011

  • In the Literature: Research You Need to Know

    August 18, 2011

  • Out of Control

    August 11, 2011

  • Smooth Moves

    August 11, 2011

  • 1

    Neuro-HM Gains Numbers, Momentum

    August 10, 2011

  • 1

    Power Through Afternoon Energy Slumps

    August 4, 2011

1 … 786 787 788 789 790 … 967
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-instagramfa-youtube-playfa-commentfa-envelopefa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences