It is a well-known fact that health care expenditure in the United States occupies a large proportion of its gross domestic product. In fact, it was 17.8% in 2016,in other advanced countries. However, this expenditure does not necessarily translate into optimal patient outcomes.
In 2012, the Institute of Medicine reported that the U.S. health care system wastes $750 billion per year in spending thatto patients or the system; and patients can also suffer a financial impact from the delivery of low-value care.
In 2013, the Pediatrics Committee of the Society of Hospital Medicine publishedaimed to decrease the use of low-value interventions. These recommendations were:
1. Do not order chest radiographs (CXR) in children with asthma or bronchiolitis.
2. Do not use systemic corticosteroids in children aged under 2 years with a lower respiratory tract infection.
3. Do not use bronchodilators in children with bronchiolitis.
4. Do not treat gastroesophageal reflux in infants routinely with acid suppression therapy.
5. Do not use continuous pulse oximetry routinely in children with acute respiratory illness unless they are on supplemental oxygen.
This publication led to the implementation of quality improvement initiatives across different hospitals and institutions nationally. Eventually, a team of hospitalists developed athat were part of the Children’s Hospital Association (CHA). The data stemming from the report card analysis would allow for benchmarking and comparing performance, as well as determining the secular trend in utilization of these procedures across the different institutions of the CHA.
Reyes et al. recently published thein the Journal of Hospital Medicine, noting a positive impact of the SHM Choosing Wisely® recommendation in decreasing the utilization of low-value interventions. The authors compared the performance before and after the publication of the recommendations for a 9-year period (2008-2017). The most relevant impact occurred in children with bronchiolitis, with a decrease of 36% of bronchodilator use and of 31% in CXR utilization. In children with asthma, CXR utilization decreased by 20.8%. The authors found that, although there was a steady decrease in the utilization of low-value services, this was still limited.
What factors could impact the effectiveness of high-value quality initiatives? First of all, quality improvement requires a substantial investment of collective effort and time. It requires a change in culture that often involves changing longstanding paradigms. The Choosing Wisely® recommendations target a very specific, low-clinical-severity population – the focus is on “uncomplicated” disease. This is important as you don’t want to pursue aggressive unnecessary intervention in children and potentially cause harm – for example, unnecessary use of steroids in a child with uncomplicated bronchiolitis who may improve with nasal suctioning alone. There is a need to appraise patients with more complex presentation of these diseases (for example, patients that require escalation of care to ICU), and this is beyond the scope of Choosing Wisely®. Further research is needed to see if higher-value care interventions can be implemented among these higher acuity and severity patients.
In our institution, we have created specific care paths that facilitate following these recommendations. Essentially, we have leveraged the EHR order sets to avoid the inclusion of low-value interventions; all stakeholders (respiratory therapy, nursing, etc.) are aware of the care path and ensure compliance. Even further, as a consequence of the change in culture toward high-value care, we have identified low-value interventions in settings where high-value quality improvement can be implemented – for example, we found that at least 20% of noncritically ill children undergoing an appendectomy.
Changes always start small; quality improvement requires a lot of effort, and we must focus our energy on “low-hanging fruit,” and also begin tackling higher complexity tasks. In the Choosing Wisely® manuscript cited above, the authors found that there was a change in performance with a tendency toward higher-value care, yet the change was not as substantial as originally thought.
How can we tackle higher complexity tasks if we find it difficult to implement solutions for those of lower complexity? My answer is simple. Maintain a consistent and continuous focus on high value, and ensure the message is iterative and redundant with feedback on performance, decrease in costs, and enhanced patient outcomes.
Dr. Auron is the quality improvement and patient safety officer in the department of hospital medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. He also serves as associate professor of medicine and pediatrics in the staff department of hospital medicine and department of pediatric hospital medicine. This article first appeared on the Hospital Leader, SHM’s official blog, at hospitalleader.org.