Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • #JHM Chat
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Your First Chair Job

An increase in uninsured patients who show up in emergency departments (EDs), physician specialty shortages, and a physician population unwilling to take call all have led to a now-common practice: hospitals pay physician-specialists for on-call coverage of their EDs.

Though essential for providing adequate emergency care, this hospital-physician arrangement can violate anti-kickback laws. But recently, one hospital’s payments to on-call physicians was given an official federal stamp of approval. What does this official statement mean for hospital medicine groups and the hospitalists they employ?

Origins of the Opinion

In September 2007, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) issued an advisory opinion that a hospital that pays physicians for providing on-call and indigent care services in the ED does not violate the federal anti-kickback statute.

An unnamed medical center requested the opinion and submitted details on the comprehensive, detailed program it had created to ensure coverage of the ED.

The hospital’s program includes varied payment structures for staff physicians based on their participation in an on-call schedule for the ED and provision of inpatient follow-up care to patients seen while on call, among other actions.

Policy Points

Patient Safety Toolkits Available from AHRQ

The Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ) has released 17 toolkits for Partnerships in Implementing Patient Safety (PIPS). The toolkits were developed by AHRQ-funded experts, including several hospitalists who specialize in patient safety research. They’re designed to help physicians, nurses, hospital managers, patients, and others reduce medical errors. For details to access the toolkits, visit AHRQ’s Web site at www.ahrq.gov/qual/pips.

Money Tops List of Hospital CEOs’ Worries

It’s no surprise that, according to a 2007 survey by the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE), financial challenges again ranked as the top concern for hospital chief executive officers. In its annual survey of top issues confronting hospital CEOs, ACHE asked respondents to rank the three most pressing issues affecting their hospital and identify specific areas of concern. Seventy percent cited financial challenges as one of their top three concerns, compared with 72% in 2006 and 67% in 2005. Providing care to uninsured patients placed second, followed by hospital relationships with physicians, according to the survey results.

Congress Boosts Budget for AHRQ

At the end of its 2007 term, Congress approved an omnibus bill that provides fiscal year 2008 funding for many federal health agencies, including AHRQ. The bill boosts AHRQ’s funding from $319 million to $334 million, including $30 million earmarked for comparative effectiveness research.

CMS Offers Education on Two Hot Topics

A new program from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) concerning hospital-acquired infections is expected to have a significant effect on hospital medicine.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt was charged with identifying at least two conditions that:

  • Are high cost, high volume, or both;
  • Result in the assignment of a case to a diagnosis-related group that has a higher payment when present as a secondary diagnosis; and
  • Could reasonably have been prevented through the application of evidence-based guidelines.

After September, hospitals will not receive additional payment for discharges when one of the conditions is acquired during hospitalization.

Two fact sheets are available on the CMS Web site (www.cms.hhs.gov/ HospitalAcqCond):

  • “The Hospital-Acquired Conditions (HAC) in Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Hospitals Fact Sheet”; and
  • “The Present on Admission (POA) Indicator Reporting by Acute Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Hospitals Fact Sheet.”

Also available are those conditions being considered for fiscal year 2009 rulemaking process and reporting requirements.

Hospitalists’ consistent and complete medical documentation will become even more important under this program. Medical record documentation from any provider involved in the care and treatment of the patient can be used to support the determination of whether a condition was present on admission.—JJ

  • Your First Chair Job

    March 2, 2008

  • Teamwork Triumphs

    March 2, 2008

  • 1

    Combat Adverse Effects

    March 2, 2008

  • In the Literature

    March 2, 2008

  • 1

    SHM Takes on VTE

    March 1, 2008

  • Patient-activated RRTs Catch On Around the U.S.

    March 1, 2008

  • 1

    Safety in Numbers

    March 1, 2008

  • SHM to Challenge OHRP’s Checklist Ruling

    March 1, 2008

  • In the Literature

    February 2, 2008

  • 1

    SHM Forms Hospitalist IT Task Force

    February 2, 2008

1 … 895 896 897 898 899 … 962
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-instagramfa-youtube-playfa-commentfa-envelopefa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences