Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Empagliflozin After Acute Myocardial Infarction (EMPACT-MI)

Clinical question: Does starting empagliflozin for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and new onset systolic heart failure (HF) or congestive symptoms reduce the risk of first hospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause?

Background: After AMI, patients are at increased risk for HF and death, especially if they present with congestive symptoms or a decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Empagliflozin improves cardiovascular outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and HF. The empagliflozin in acute myocardial infarction (EMMY) trial showed that in patients with a recent MI, empagliflozin was associated with a reduction in natriuretic peptide and improvement in echocardiographic parameters. The EMPACT-MI trial assessed whether empagliflozin lowers the risk of first hospitalization for HF and all-cause mortality in patients with AMI.

Study design: International, event-driven, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled

Setting: 451 sites in 22 countries in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia from December 2020 to March 2023

Synopsis: EMPACT-MI enrolled patients with AMI, either ST-elevation myocardial infarction (75%) or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (25%), with new onset LVEF <45% or treatment for congestion. Patients with prior chronic HF or already on sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor therapy were excluded. Participants had to have more than one additional risk factor for HF hospitalization or death, such as age ≥65, LVEF <35%, 3-vessel coronary artery disease, prior MI, atrial fibrillation, or type 2 diabetes.

Within 14 days of the AMI, patients were randomized to empagliflozin versus placebo (3,260 versus 3,262). During a median follow-up of 17.9 months, the incidence of first hospitalization for HF or all-cause mortality (primary outcome) was 5.9 versus 6.6 events per 100 patient-years for empagliflozin and placebo groups, respectively (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; P=0.21). Of the components of the primary outcome, first hospitalization for HF was decreased in the empagliflozin group (3.6% versus 4.7%; HR, 0.77; 0.95% CI, 0.6 to 0.98). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (5.2% versus 5.5%; HR, 0.96; 95%CI, 0.78 to 1.19). Limitations included the timing of the study during the COVID-19 pandemic when HF hospitalizations were substantially lower.

Bottom line: Early initiation of empagliflozin after AMI with new-onset systolic HF or signs and symptoms of congestion did not reduce a composite outcome of first hospitalization for HF or death from any cause.

Citation: Butler J, et al. Empagliflozin after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(16):1455-66.

Dr. Sokolova

Dr. Sokolova is a hospitalist in the division of hospital medicine at the Mount Sinai Health System and an assistant professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.

  • Empagliflozin After Acute Myocardial Infarction (EMPACT-MI)

    January 1, 2025

  • Clinical Risk Score Predicts Arterial Thrombosis in Survivors of Intracranial Hemorrhage

    January 1, 2025

  • Implementing and Evaluating a DBN Initiative in a Large Tertiary Care Urban Hospital

    January 1, 2025

  • Understanding Potentially Preventable 7-Day Readmission Rates in Medical Oncology Patients

    January 1, 2025

  • SHM Hill Day 2024

    January 1, 2025

  • Global Hospital Medicine

    January 1, 2025

  • Illicit Medetomidine Use with Fentanyl

    January 1, 2025

  • Running Dry: How Hospitalists Can Conquer the IV Fluid Crisis

    January 1, 2025

  • Residents Look Forward to a New Year

    January 1, 2025

  • Job Hunt Essentials for Hospitalists

    January 1, 2025

1 … 28 29 30 31 32 … 984
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences