Menu Close
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech
An Official Publication of
  • Clinical
    • In the Literature
    • Key Clinical Questions
    • Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
    • Coding Corner
    • Clinical
    • Clinical Guidelines
    • COVID-19
    • POCUS
  • Practice Management
    • Quality
    • Public Policy
    • How We Did It
    • Key Operational Question
    • Technology
    • Practice Management
  • Diversity
  • Career
    • Leadership
    • Education
    • Movers and Shakers
    • Career
    • Learning Portal
    • The Hospital Leader Blog
  • Pediatrics
  • HM Voices
    • Commentary
    • In Your Eyes
    • In Your Words
    • The Flipside
  • SHM Resources
    • Society of Hospital Medicine
    • Journal of Hospital Medicine
    • SHM Career Center
    • SHM Converge
    • Join SHM
    • Converge Coverage
    • SIG Spotlight
    • Chapter Spotlight
    • From JHM
  • Industry Content
    • Patient Monitoring with Tech

Coding Corner: Type 1 MI, Type 2 MI, or Non-Ischemic Myocardial Injury

An 82-year-old female with a history of hypertension and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) was admitted with fever, hypotension, and confusion. The workup revealed Escherichia coli bacteremia due to a urinary tract infection. She developed acute kidney injury requiring IV fluids and monitoring. Labs showed a troponin level of 0.22 ng/mL (reference, less than 0.04). Her ECG showed no ischemic changes, and she had no chest pain or dyspnea. The hospitalist team noted the elevated troponin as likely secondary to demand ischemia from sepsis and renal failure.

What documentation is most accurate for this situation?

The final diagnosis will include sepsis, acute renal failure, and non-ischemic myocardial injury. Elevated troponin above the 99th percentile alone does not justify myocardial infarction (MI) coding. Documentation must specify which of the following the elevation reflects: Type 1 MI, which is plaque rupture or acute coronary syndrome with ischemia (can be documented as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction depending on ECG findings); Type 2 MI, which is supply-demand mismatch with ischemia (needs ischemic symptoms, ECG changes, or imaging evidence of ischemia); or non-ischemic myocardial injury, which reflects elevated troponin without symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes, or imaging evidence of ischemia,  such as in the setting of sepsis or acute renal failure. Coders require this distinction, as it affects diagnostic-related group classification and reimbursement. 

Tip

Don’t document “elevated troponin” in isolation. Specify: Type 1 MI, Type 2 MI, or non-ischemic myocardial injury based on symptoms, ECG changes, and imaging findings. This distinction ensures accurate coding, complexity, and reflects appropriate care. In sepsis or renal failure, “non-ischemic myocardial injury” is often the most accurate term.

Dr. Ali is the associate program director of internal medicine residency at Endeavor Health-North Shore Hospitals in Chicago.

  • Coding Corner: Type 1 MI, Type 2 MI, or Non-Ischemic Myocardial Injury

    October 1, 2025

  • Using AI/NLP to Improve Clinical Efficiency and Drive Patient-Centered Care in Cancer Research

    October 1, 2025

  • Patients View Physicians as More Compassionate and Trustworthy When Their Message is Optimistic

    October 1, 2025

  • IV Iron Lowers the Risk of HF Hospitalization for Patients with HF (EF <50%) and Iron Deficiency

    October 1, 2025

  • AI-Assisted Patient Screening Improves Rate of Eligibility Determination and Enrollment Compared to Traditional Manual Methods

    October 1, 2025

  • SGLT-2 Inhibitors’ Increased Risk of PAD-Related Surgical Events Compared to DPP-4 Inhibitors’ Risk When Used as Add-On Therapy in Diabetes

    October 1, 2025

  • Liberal Fluid Intake Does Not Worsen Outcomes in CHF

    October 1, 2025

  • History of Antibiotic Stewardship

    October 1, 2025

  • Fighting the Pandemic of Misinformation

    October 1, 2025

  • Boosting Patient Care: The Power of Inpatient Immunizations

    October 1, 2025

1 2 3 … 975
  • About The Hospitalist
  • Contact Us
  • The Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Authors
  • Publishing Opportunities
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.
    ISSN 1553-085X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • SHM’s DE&I Statement
  • Cookie Preferences