Comments

  1. Cliff Kaye

    Great commentary. The same things that make hospitalism more palatable for senior staff are what will make it sustainable for younger staff. Lowering team censuses and reducing shift length will help reduce moral injury and turnover at all ages. Everyone will benefit.

    Reply
  2. Evan Lewis

    I worked as a hospitalist / nocturnist for the last 11 years of my career as an internist until I retired at 70 years old. After 5 years on 12 hour night shifts I transferred to another hospital that allowed 8 hour night shifts. I found it enjoyable and satisfying, although management piled on more and more work until it became quite unmanageable. When I retired, they had to replace me with two hospitalists.

    Reply
  3. Edward Taylor, MD, FACP

    I think the term Hospitalist was coined in 1996 not 1998 by Dr Wachter. Great article. I’m still working at 73. I need a more accommodating schedule!!

    Reply
  4. Donna Cardoza

    Very timely article. All too relevant, especially as us senior hospitalist are invariably also training our own replacements as we do residents training.

    Reply
  5. mona lazar

    I totally agree with this article. Many jobs demand night work from everybody,and it’s just unsustainable. I was willing to do it right out of residency with the pressures of buying a home, paying for a nanny, and starting to pay down student debt, but now that I’m more focused on actually enjoying what I am doing, I find the hospitalist work intolerable. The patients have actually gotten more complicated, and the number of people transferring into hospitals all through the night has just made working evenings and nights that much harder than 20 years ago.

    Reply
  6. Sanjay

    Brilliant article, hitting the nail on the head! Recognition of the increasingly complex patient population often places sick patients on the floor who, even 10 years ago would have been in the ICU! There’s barely any MedSurg beds in tertiary hospitals and turned to mostly acute care. Our institution actually offers senior staff to take on schedules without nights. Identifying the problem is the first step towards solving it!!

    Reply
  7. Mary Jo Groves

    I just retired, reluctantly, just before turning 70. Even day shifts became intolerable with the demand for lower and lower LOS translating a floating census of 17-20 patients into 20-25 actual touches with admits and discharges overwhelming my ability to care for increasingly complicated patients. Not one of us wants this kind of stressed physician OF ANY AGE trying to manage us or our loved ones. CEO’s need to climb into hospital beds anonymously and see what it’s like to be sick these days. This is not what any of us went into medicine for…

    Reply
  8. William Heard

    I am a recent retiree and agree in substance and spirit with all of the above comments. It strikes me that the admin types do not recognize the efficiencies our experience could bring to the care of patients. I did some rough calculations on doing a few fewer CBC’s, CMP’s, CT scans etc… and other diagnostic studies per patient over the course of a career. The number quickly gets into the millions of dollars. The tracking of who actually orders what testing is not robust. It takes a lot of experience to be able to say not to do something. Maybe AI will replace our ability to recognize at bedside the type and natural history of disease and make some diagnoses at a glance. When that happens, the pleasure of this line of work will be decreased. I do believe patients and family appreciate seeing someone with a some gray hair at the bedside.

    Reply

Comment on this Article

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *