“The Case for Unit-Based Hospitalists: Benefits and Challenges”
IN THEORY, unit-based de-ployment of hospitalists is a perfect answer to the struggles of navigating, say, a 16-patient census that includes seven units on four floors. But in the real world, it’s not.
“Just placing hospitalists on a unit and giving them patients isn’t the answer,” said Russell L. Holman, MD, SFHM, chief operating officer for Cogent Healthcare in Brentwood, Tenn., and past president of SHM. “Structure has to support a deliberate strategy. Think of what your strategic goals are. … Don’t just implement a new structure and let that be the end.”
Dr. Holman led a panel, “The Case for Unit-Based Hospitalists: Benefits and Challenges,” in which HM experts agreed that tracking the efficacy of the setup is key to success.
Although the benefits are usually clear—less time spent traveling from floor to floor and more direct communication between physicians and nonphysician providers (NPPs)—the challenges can be numerous, including:
Kevin O’Leary, MD, MS, associate chief of hospital medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, urges physicians to be practical, and not to expect the unit-based approach to be a panacea. “This is really the first step,” he said. HM10
The Hospitalist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in hospital medicine. The Hospitalist reaches more than 25,000 hospitalists, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, residents, and medical administrators interested in the practice and business of hospital medicine.
Copyright © 2000–2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. or related companies. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 1553-085X